Women's Plain Front Classic Straight Boot Cut Pants
Wanted to like but crotch was 3 - 4" too low
I so wanted to love these pants but the crotch was 3 -4" below where it should have been. Waist was ok, butt area doesn't allow for much of a booty and thighs were average but crotch was like a tired pair of pantyhose at the end of a long hot day. What the heck? So weird. I am 5'9" 134lbs. Normally wear a 4 but got a 6 based on reviews. Feel a 4 would be too tight in the butt & waist but crotch problem might be solved???? When I pulled the crotch to where it should be the waist was in the mom-jean area and I was swimming in extra material. When I pulled the waist down to the now trendy height the crotch was awful. Material is a little thick but not offensive. Seems like you wouldn't have to iron these things.Returning the size 6.
May 26, 2015
They're just OK
I bought these pants for something I could wear in a business casual work environment. I had them hemmed with a cuff on the pants. The bottom of the pant leg below the knee was baggier than I anticipated. I would have preferred a more tailored fit. They are true to size, but I would say that they are a little snugger than some of the other pants, but this is because they simply don't have any stretch to them. They went through the washer and dryer great and needed no pressing. I wouldn't return them, but probably wouldn't buy another pair either.
January 22, 2015
Perfect casual pant.
These pants fit exactly as expected, look great, are comfortable, are good quality fabric and best of all, despite being a custom-hemmed item, they arrived (I live in Canada) in four days. Amazing. Thank you Land's End.
September 29, 2014
I love the style of these pants and the wear is great, but the fit has me a little perplexed! They are a classic straight cut which I love but I ordered my usual size and the waist is very tight and the hips and butt are too big. When ordering a plus size you expect a bit more room in the waist - when will the garment makers realize that all women are different not a perfect size 12 or even 16 - I am tall, with a larger waist and smaller hips and thin legs!!!
September 25, 2014
The reviews were right these are the strangest cut ever and not up to Land's End standards
I sent them back. Even though I ordered a size up based on the reviews they still didn't fit. The fabric had a very odd stretch and they were impossible to sit down in with any level of comfort. Very disappointing.
July 24, 2014
Great cut but too hot
I am a pear-shaped size 18. This cut fit great as far as the waist, butt, hips and was tailored to the length I requested. I also asked to have the back pockets sewn closed. I appreciate that LE places enough belt loops around the waist. The colour was a true, rich navy blue. My dislike came from the fabric, the 60:40 cotton-polyester blend; it was much too hot. I also found the fabric did not have enough "give". I found it very uncomfortable to sit down. I'm going to look for the same style in a different fabric blend.
June 22, 2014
As a 5'9 plus size (3x dress) I ordered these pants hopeful. I read the other reviews and ordered them in a bigger size (2 sizes bigger actually). The waist didn't fit at all. there were inches between the buttons... and the legs were too baggy. Not a boot cut at all. LE just has it all wrong with these. I'll stick to dresses and tops. Pants are horrible.
April 25, 2014
The pant legs are cut way too wide throughout to be described as classic straight.
I was looking for a spring chino pant cut similar to the Fit 2 cord bootleg pant from the recent fall/winter season. The description sounded perfect, however, I was very disappointed in the fit of this pant. The legs were cut way too wide throughout. The bottom of the bootleg was a couple of inches wider than the fall/winter cords. I returned these pants.
March 23, 2014
Run small in waist area but fits great every where else....
March 15, 2014
Looks and feels great
Love my new pants, they fit great and they look good.
October 29, 2013