Women's Modern Plain Front 60/40 Blend Chino Trousers
really wide legs
The legs on these pants are enormous, very wide from the hip to the hem. When you put them on it almost looks like you are wearing an ankle length straight skirt. Returned them.
February 22, 2014
Very unflattering shape
I consider myself a reasonably proportioned person. These pants fit well at the waist and through the hips, but it just gets worse from there. The legs are straight as described, but very wide, so wide that while I was wearing them, my daughter asked why I was wearing snow pants. Since I live in Canada and paid duty, it is not worth it for me to return them. I have taken them apart to sew the legs into a shape that is more appropriate for wearing to work.
February 18, 2014
This was purchased as a gift. Would have liked a true size 2, but the person they were given to was thrilled to have clothes that came close to her size. Bigger in the hips than what is shown in the picture.
December 8, 2013
Pants stand out but have a few design flaws
These pants are as described, a heavier weight that holds up to all day wear and the fabric drapes well but doesn't cling to show figure flaws. I am plus size w/an hourglass shape. My hips and bottom are significantly wider than my waist. I ordered the first time in my regular size and the waist/hip ratio didn't quite pan out. I went up a size and will need to wear w/belt. The waist band is really wide and has an inside lining for structure, which adds a little bulk (I think it will help them hold up better over time, but it is really difficult to work with brand new). There's also two hooks and a button for closure and it's almost like an iron maiden trying to get your pants done up. I think two plain buttons would have been much nicer and easier. The trouser cut is a little awkward. It starts as a trouser leg from the waist/bottom area and is very flattering to start but the leg narrows down quite a bit by the time it reaches the ankle. I prefer a wide leg trouser where the cuff is as wide as the thigh, it creates a much more flattering silhouette for someone bottom heavy like me.
December 7, 2013
Finally perfect length
I was ecstatic to finally find pants in so any sizes with so many lengths to choose from. The most awesome thing ever!!!! However, I am a plus size but the waist on the pants has to be altered so I am still stuck going to the seamstress. Length I can fold but the waist nothing I can do. The waist is so big I cannot even wear belt without it gathering all around.. So sad, almost absolutely perfect.
November 9, 2013
Bell bottoms, not straight leg
Returned these, due to horrid bell bottoms. These were described as straight leg trousers, but are actually bell-bottoms/boot cut. The waist/buttocks/thighs fit lovely. However, no self-respecting woman can wear these to work (or anywhere else). Lands End, I am a faithful customer, please provide clothes we can wear. Straight or tapered legs, please.
November 3, 2013
Bell bottoms? Ridiculous!
I might have liked these pants but for the ridiculously large, wide pant legs. All the way from hip to ankle: huge billowing trouser legs. Come on, Lands End: straight legs, skinny legs, leggings - that's the style now - not this huge or even "boot cut" pant legs. I returned these.
October 27, 2013
for curvy girls with slim thighs
I'm curvy, and the waist & hips seemed to fit okay. However, I returned the pants because the thighs were just too tight for me. I normally wear a 6 or 8 in LE pants and got the 8.
October 21, 2013
Look like bellbottoms from 60's.
Weird shape. Not like picture. Legs are huge, almost laughed when I put them on.
October 20, 2013
I have a bigger belly and these were too tight in that area. But the fabric is great!
October 19, 2013