Men's Regular Pleat Front Traditional Fit No Iron Dress Twill Trousers
Item # 426850-A61
$69.00
Monogramming Options
Allow 1-2 days extra for delivery of monogrammed items. The monogram and fee will be applied to the quantity selected with this item. To order multiples of this item with different monograms, please order items one at a time.
Monogram Type
-
Share on ShopYourWay.com
ShopYourWay.com is an innovative shopping community where you can share, track and find the products you want, own or dream about. It’s fun… and free!
Description
The styling details you asked for are back!
- 100% Cotton Twill (8oz weight)
- Strong, durable combed ringspun two ply yarns
- No Iron Finish — guaranteed wrinkle free for 50 washes
- French fly, hook & bar waist closure
- Ban Rol® waistband
- Besom button through back pockets
- Locking metal zipper with small pull
- Traditional Fit Compare fit options
We heard you, we read your reviews — so here’s good news: all the details you loved (and missed) about Dress Twills are back. Gone are the flapped coin pocket and button-through close; back are the integrated French fly and hook-and-bar closure. Both back pockets button shut for security, and the new zipper is dressier (and locking). Guaranteed to look crisp through 50 washings, this premium all-cotton twill fabric also resists shrinking. Machine wash. Imported.
More Information
Unfamiliar with a word? See the Lands’ End Glossary
Fit & Size Information | Item Dimensions (.pdf)
Men's Pleat Front Traditional Fit No Iron Dress Twill Trousers
8
8
These are improved over the previous version.
Fit was good, nice sheen and finish.
April 27, 2013
Very disappointing.
I was annoyed when Lands' End discontinued the long rise/tall trousers early last year. While I found another source for dress pants, I missed (1) the choice of colors that LE had, (2) the chance to get an exact inseam, and (3) cuffs if I wanted them. When I saw that they were available again, I was please. I was prepared for the new long rise twills to be a bit different. But these are *very* different--they are much tighter in the seat, hip, and crotch.
If you like the regular twills and need a very little bit more room, then these might be for you. But if you liked the old long rise twills and are hoping to replace them, you may be very disappointed.
April 20, 2013
Not as good as they used to be
Not nearly as good as the previous batch. After waiting many months for the long rise no-iron dress twill trousers to be available, it seems that they are now made somewhere else and they do not feel like long rise at all.
Material is also coarser than it was previously.
April 19, 2013
TALL IS NO LONGER TALL.
The "new tall" is new all right -- it is too tight/short in the crouch. Disappointing since we were trying to replace a few pairs of my husband's Lands End pants in 34 Long.
Time to return. Time to find a new store.
April 18, 2013
Style good, but can't recommend long rise version.
Overall, the fit and finish were good. The long rise version in traditional fit were uncomfortable, though. The rise itself was acceptable, but could have been a bit longer. The problem was in the seam running from the crotch to the rear of the seat up to the waist. It felt like I was wearing a thong.
I had ordered a pair of long-rise traditional fit chinos a couple of weeks prior, and they were fine.
LE - thanks for bringing back the long rise pants. In this style, though, more room in the vertical seam in the rear seat would be a big plus.
April 16, 2013
Runs smaller in seat than the same style pants from 2-3 years ago
Long time, very loyal LE customer, typically making substantial purchases every year or so. I ordered these as soon as I saw LE had changed back to the previous style for the pleat front, traditional fit, no iron twill dress pants, which are the best I'd previously found at any price. These have previously been my favorite work and casual pants due to their great comfort. Needed new ones due to general wear from wearing them so often, even though I have 6 or 7 pairs.
I ordered exactly the same size, men's long, pleat front, 38 waist, traditional fit, 33.5" cuff as my prior orders, went online to check what I'd ordered.
I am very disappointed about one issue and will have to return them, even though I need some new dress khaki twills. They are definitely tighter in the seat, so much that they are unwearable. Obvious immediately. You can see my underwear through the pants they are so tight, and they are uncomfortable. They are also tighter in the thigh and crotch. When I sit, they are snug around my relatively fit thighs. I put on the same pants from 2010 and 2011, and despite being washed multiple times, the old ones are not tight in the seat, thigh, or groin, and fit perfectly. My old pants have about 2" of loose material at the mid-thigh when I'm seated.
The new pants are marked as traditional fit and long, as I've ordered previously. I tried a couple pairs of the new pants, and they are consistently small in the seat and thigh.
The styles are nearly the same. They are now made in Vietnam rather than Indonesia. Rear pockets are button through without a flap. Front pockets are off the side seam, and pockets remain deep. The zipper is said to be "upgraded", now metal over a plasticy YKK zipper that seemed to be fine. It is definitely beefier with larger teeth. One new upgrade is that the seat seam is now taped on the ends. The hanger loop is larger and easier to use.
If I can get these in a larger seat and thigh comparable to my prior LE dress twills, these are a 5 out of 5, but I am unable to wear this new cut. I gave them a 2 as a rating was required, but seems to overly simplify the issue.
Lands' End, please bring back the exact cut of the 2010-2011 NI, pleat front, Trad Fit, Long twill dress pants. Don't mess with something you had so right.
Thanks,
JG
April 16, 2013
Nice looking, fits great
Good business casual look. Comfortable.
April 7, 2013
You brought back everything but the odd numbered waste size. Bring that back too!
You brought back everything but the odd numbered waste size. Bring that back too!
March 6, 2013
1-8 of 8
