This look at the evolution of
the small but impressive invention that helps us keep ourselves together
appeared in the March 1989 issue of our catalog.
A History of the Button
by Roy Earnshaw
Listen. Listen hard.
Something is trying to tell
you something. Those little round discs, there on your shirt. Yes, yes,
your buttons.
They're saying, "Let us tell
you stories, of our former glories. Plain though now we be, once magnificent
were we."
You can't hear them? Well,
maybe not. Life is awfully loud these days. And fast. And huge. Hard to
focus on a humble little button.
Guess it's up to us to tell
you stories of their former glories.
Which is as it should be. We
owe a lot to buttons, all of us. (Especially those of us at Lands' End,
where we affix millions of them to our products each year.)
After all, they protect us
from immodesty. They keep the weather at bay. They give us something to
do with our ofttimes nervous hands.
So settle down in a nice, quiet
place. Give your tea a couple stirs. And join us as we tell tales of kings
and queens, guilds and gilds, celluloid and corozo nuts, in "A History
of the Button."
Prehistoric buttons? Well,
maybe.
SHERMAN, SET THE WAYBACK MACHINE
for Phoenicia, 3000 B.C. Here we see dusky people strolling hither and
yon, working and talking, wearing the loose-fitting tunics of ancient
times.
"Your mother wears military
sandals!" shouts one man to another, as everyone laughs. (Ancient times
were often merry, unless you were a slave, or lived next to an active
volcano.)
As we observe these people
more closely, we see objects that look suspiciously like buttons, at the
gather of a garment, or hanging pendant-like around the neck of an official.
They are round, they seem to
have shanks. Some are gold, some bone, some clay. Some are plain, others
engraved with designs.
But are they really buttons?
Probably not, in the modern sense of a functional fastener. But they were
certainly a precursor of the modern button, and archeologists have gone
to a lot of bother digging them up, so we herewith give them a nod of
recognition, and depart for more modern times, and the first recorded
mentions of the button.
(After all, mere speculation
has no place in such a learned history as this!)
Commoners and kings.
ABOUT 1250 A.D. ETIENNE BOILEAU,
Provost of Paris (sort of like the Mayor) established laws governing French
craft guilds (sort of like unions). One of these was the buttonmaker's
guild.
Guild candidates had to be
at least 17 years of age, of legitimate birth, and willing to fork over
a fifth of their wages to the guild, a tenth to their king.
This is about the earliest
recorded indication that buttons were becoming increasingly popular. And,
they were also becoming buttons in the true modern sense, thanks to the
invention of the buttonhole by some unknown genius, perhaps as early as
the 13th century.
People found buttons aesthetically
pleasing. Inevitably, they came to be symbols of rank, affluence and,
unfortunately, oppression.
Most commoners couldn't afford
the fancy, finely-crafted tapestry or metal buttons the aristocrats had
taken to wearing. But even had they scraped together the necessary francs,
they couldn't have worn them: royal decree restricted them to plain cloth-
or thread-covered buttons.
This must have rankled, especially
given the extravagant tastes of the aristocracy, who aped the even more
lavish styles of the French court.
In their lust for fancier and
fancier buttons, the French kings drove the increasingly skillful guild
buttonmakers to new heights of artistry, soon establishing France as the
center of the world's burgeoning button industry.
King Francis I of France, for
instance, had a formal costume adorned with 13,600 buttons, and resembled
a Las Vegas casino when the bright light hit him.
A century later, Louis XIV
embarked upon a 72-year reign of button buying that ultimately cost France
over five million dollars, thereby draining the national treasury. (Four
wars and a new palace at Versailles also contributed.) The Sun King favored
gold buttons embellished with precious stones, and doled them out to whichever
of his mistresses pleased him most.
The English kings got in the
act too. Charles I of England, a contemporary of the Sun King, popularized
the use of handkerchiefs decorated with jewelled buttons. (He was later
beheaded, but not for that particular offense.)
Royal tastes were gaudy. Precious
metals were abundant. Closer-fitting, more button-laden garments had come
into style. (And most coats now had buttons on the sleeves, to discourage
men from using them as napkins.) All these things helped usher in the
century in which the button shines forth in its greatest magnificence.
The Golden Age of buttondom.
IN THE 18TH CENTURY, buttons
truly became tiny works of art. And this isn't mere speculation, because
many 18th century buttons survive to the present day, in museums and with
the many individual collectors who cherish them.
Button making became a profitable
sideline for many of the artists of the day. Between portraits, painters
painted buttons. (Sometimes, even signed the buttons they painted, but
few of these have survived). Famous potters made ceramic buttons. Silversmiths
engraved silver buttons. Fine cabinetmakers carved rich wooden buttons.
Weavers wove fine "passementerie" buttons of multicolored silks.
Typically, the most exquisite
of these buttons are about the size of a 50-cent piece, made by mounting
a painting or carving under glass within a metal shell which is fitted
with a loop shank.
The fashions and buttons of
France were copied eagerly by the rest of Europe. And as always, it was
the French kings who set the trends.
Louis XV favored somewhat sedate
engraved gold buttons, perhaps sensing revolution in the air, and not
wanting to provoke the people. ("After me, the deluge!" he muttered darkly,
near the end of his life.)
But Louis XVI reverted to the
flamboyance of his royal ancestor, the Sun King, with outlandishly large
and ornate buttons (perhaps in competition with the outlandish hairstyles
of wife Marie Antoinette), and drew scathing fire from the philosophers
of the day.
Frenchmen vied for button supremacy.
A foppish gent might strut into a soiree wearing a waistcoat whose every
button presented the portrait of a different lady, only to slink away
in humiliation at the sight of a dandy each of whose own coat buttons
depicted a different bawdy scene. (Satyrs bounding over picnic baskets,
that sort of thing.)
Fascinating French buttons
from the 18th century abound. The habitat button presented arrangements
of dried flowers, shells, even (yuck) insects under glass. And the rebus
button played to the vogue for riddles by displaying words and phrases
that sounded like other words and phrases. When deciphered, they usually
bore romantic messages such as "Love you without end" or "I'm a hog for
you, baby."
(Just kidding on that last
one.)
England steps forward.
FRANCE WAS UNRIVALLED for the
artistry, the opulence of its buttons. But England soon began demonstrating
its native mechanical aptitude with a flourishing button industry of its
own, which extended into almost every nook and cranny of the Kingdom,
and utilized many of the new materials then becoming available.
Birmingham gained fame for
its metal and shell buttons. In the Midlands artisans produced horn buttons
from the antlers of the stag. Dorset fashioned thread buttons. And in
Burslem, Staffordshire, Josiah Wedgwood began creating his delicate "jasper
medallions."
Inventive in stamping, molding,
casting and suchlike, English buttonmakers pioneered techniques that allowed
mass production of buttons, and made them accessible to almost everyone,
not just a pampered few.
For working people who wanted
to emulate the rich, Matthew Boulton created dazzling cut steel buttons,
actually reproductions of earlier marcasite imitations of diamonds. The
rhinestones of the 18th century!
While French buttons most often
displayed scenes of romance or the arts, English buttons tended toward
scenes of country life. Sporting buttons became popular, many featuring
the wily fox.
Some well-heeled gents even
commissioned sets in which each button bore the name and noble visage
of a different beloved hunting dog.
Meanwhile, back in the USA...
AMERICANS BELIEVED IN plain
speech, plain buttons. And imported most of those from England.
But a few small American button
manufacturers did spring up in the 18th century, some of them quite inventive.
In Philadelphia around 1720, German immigrant Casper Wister began making
brass buttons. Later, his son Richard took over the business, and promoted
the Wister buttons with a uniquely Yankee twist: he guaranteed them for
a full seven years!
(A nice feature in those days,
when buttons were used over and over, from one garment to another.)
Early American buttons were
made of wood, pewter, brass. Phineas Pratt of Connecticut turned out ivory
buttons as a sideline to his main occupation of making piano keys. And
patriot silversmith Paul Revere fashioned fine silver buttons.
As the Revolutionary War approached,
English imports became decidedly less popular. Just before the war, the
Provincial Congress of Massachusetts recommended using domestic papier-mâché
buttons rather than English metal ones. And, in 1787, an article in "Federal
Manufacturers" urged against importing Birmingham buttons, recommending
instead silver buttons engraved with the Federal eagle, made by red-blooded
American silversmiths, and wearable "for years and for lives."
But out of necessity, English
buttons continued to be imported for some time.
Perhaps the most prized of
the early American buttons are those made for George Washington's first
and second inaugurations. Hand-stamped in copper, brass or Shefheld silver
plate, they are known to exist in 22 different patterns.
Ga ga over gilt.
THE 19TH CENTURY brought a more
practical sensibility to the world, and with it, new kinds of buttons.
The French Revolution had swept
away much of the extravagance of the aristocracy, and the dandies who
had once so cravenly imitated the gaudy French kings now adopted the characteristic
dark blue coat of Beau Brummel, with its large brass buttons. Women's
neoclassical fashions required no buttons.
Buttons became smaller, usually
about half the size of 18th century buttons. And, while they might still
be handcrafted works of art, more often now they were mass-produced works
of craft. France was slow to mechanize, so ingenious England gradually
became the world's premier buttonmaker. And, created the first real button
sensation of the new century.
The first wonderfully sparkly
gilt buttons were made in Birmingham between 1797 and 1800. They were
elegant, yet affordable. People took to them immediately, and they became
the height of fashion. Even the Americans began making gilt buttons by
1810, after stealing the gilding secret from the British!
Actually, the process was a
fairly simple one. Five grains of gold per gross (144) of buttons was
added to a mixture of mercury, then brushed on the brass buttons, which
were then cooked in a furnace. Buttons could be double gilt, triple gilt,
and so on, depending on the number of grains or number of brushings used.
The new gilt buttons were the
vanguard of a "golden age" of metal buttonmaking that flourished in the
first half of the 19th century, and produced buttons that haven't been
equaled to this day. Sporting buttons for the gent, military buttons for
the soldier, even livery buttons for the household servant were all beautifully
crafted.
Queen Victoria's contribution.
DESPITE THE BEAUTY of the metal
button, its popularity was soon eclipsed by that of the cloth-covered
button, especially after new machines were invented for its mass production.
(The metal button did have an annoying habit of rusting, especially in
the damp English climate.)
Other types of buttons appeared
for the first time. Glass buttons, clear or deeply colored, decorated
with paintings, inlays, molded scenes. Vulcanized rubber buttons, created
by Charles Goodyear in 1851 after he accidentally dropped a mixture of
rubber and sulphur on a hot stove. (But don't try that trick at home,
kids!) And vegetable ivory buttons, from the corozo nut, a small sort
of cocoa nut from South America.
In 1861, England's Prince Albert
died, and Queen Victoria went into a mourning that would last the rest
of her life. She took to wearing black jet buttons on her sombre black
costumes, a habit her subjects and others around the world took to imitating
with black glass buttons, until they became perhaps the most widespread
buttons of the 19th century.
The last gasp of the elegant
button.
AS THE CENTURY waned, buttons
were being produced in more varieties than ever before. And, being worn
by more people.
Men no longer led the way in
the wearing of fancy buttons. Women had rebelled against their staid fashions,
turning to jackets, vests and boots, in more adventurous colors, with
larger and more ornate buttons.
Missionaries carried buttons
to the far corners of the earth, to help clothe "the heathen." And wealthy
travelers on freespending "grand tours" brought grand new varieties of
buttons back home.
Homebodies were buying more
buttons too, thanks to the increasing use of home sewing machines, and
the invention of paper patterns by Ebenezer Butterick.
The first button collectors
even appeared in the United States, young girls who gathered them for
"charm strings." Legend had it that once a girl collected a thousand buttons
on her string, Prince Charming would come and claim her for his bride.
Buttons were big business.
But sadly, most buttons were becoming the mundane, mass-produced variety
made from cheap materials. Primitive plastics had even reared their heads:
an American billiard ball manufacturer offered $1,000 to anyone who could
create a synthetic substitute for ivory, and enterprising John Wesley
Hyatt invented celluloid.
Perhaps in reaction to this
trend toward cheap buttons and to the general clumsiness of manufactured
goods an attempt was made to revive some of the elegant buttonmaking
techniques of the 18th century.
France again produced "under
glass" buttons. Italy contributed glass "paperweight" buttons with tiny
bursts of kaleidoscopic color. From China came fancy enameled buttons.
Many countries made fine porcelain buttons, with painted or transfer-printed
designs. And England created hauntingly beautiful silver Art Nouveau buttons,
often picturing women with flowing hair and willowy forms.
Even the United Stated joined
the revival, with charming "calico" buttons, made of china and featuring
designs reminiscent of homespun checked calico fabric patterns.
But the most popular buttons
at the turn of the century weren't the least bit elegant. They were "picture
buttons," often worn in long rows down the front of coats or dresses,
and picturing everything imaginable.
In this vein, in the early
years of George V, some English sports took to wearing "theatrical buttons"
on their waistcoats, with prints or photos of actresses under clear celluloid,
but they were considered "common" by the upper classes, who disapproved
of anyone appearing to have too much fun.
Marching toward the mundane
with Modern Buttons.
AROUND THE TURN OF THE CENTURY
men adopted the 4-hole button as their standard. And women soon followed
suit especially after more "man tailored" clothing became popular after
World War I, due to the influence of the military uniform.
Now, the 4-hole button is a
wonderful invention, but it simply doesn't offer the decorative possibilities
that a shank button does. So it hastened the decline of its more colorful
cousin.
Other enemies to the fancy
button loomed. Modern synthetics. The zipper. And later, the spin drier.
But the 20th century button
still had a few surprises left, to make us smile, and shake our heads
in admiration.
In the Roaring Twenties, flappers
Charlestoned wearing garter buttons (often featuring the face of Betty
Boop). And as longer, more feminine clothing styles became popular, large
glass and pottery buttons appeared. Celluloid was also used but fell out
of favor due to its flammability.
Unfortunately, costume jewelry
also became popular, lessening the need for fancy buttons as wardrobe
accents.
Come the 30s, the novelty button
appeared to help take our minds off the Depression. It might look like
a cigarette pack. A basket of fruit. A ukelele. A pork chop. Even Mickey
Mouse.
It made us laugh. And it didn't
cost a lot, because it was made of plastic, and you could buy it at the
dimestore.
When families gathered around
the radio for entertainment, they might hear the voice of Mrs. Gertrude
Patterson, who spoke about her beloved button collection, and inspired
people to begin searching attics and old pinboxes for tiny treasures.
It was a diversion people could afford.
Occasionally, a fashion designer
came along who recognized the potential of the button. Elsa Sciaparelli,
famous for her collaborations with artists like Dali and Cocteau, designed
in 1938 a silk brocade jacket decorated with carousel horses highlighted
with buttons in the shape of acrobats tumbling down the front.
But Sciaparelli also promoted
the button's noisy new nemesis, the zipper, which was picking up steam
after a lackluster start on money belts, tobacco pouches and galoshes.
(The name "zipper" had been
coined by B. F. Goodrich president Bertram G. Work who was looking for
a new name for his "Mystic Boot," which featured the newfangled fastener,
a name with some "zip," and so began calling it "The Zipper Boot.")
In World War II, patriotic
buttons appeared: eagles, flags, stars. And in England, "blackout buttons"
which radiated light became tiny heroes, attached to the lapel and back
of those on the dim homefront.
After the war, materials shortages
resulted in a surge of buttons made of everything from paper pulp to rabbit
fur. But then came the recovery, and a return to the mostly synthetic,
largely unassuming buttons we wear today. Buttons that go about their
business without attracting undue attention to themselves. Eeentsy little
bores.
A few final musings.
WE CONFESS after many trips
to libraries and button shops, and a few late nights at the typewriter,
we've become pretty attached to buttons.
(No pun intended. Well, maybe
just a little one.)
And, we feel sad that their
glory days seem to be behind them.
But the nice thing about the
future is, it's unpredictable. One of these days, fancy buttons
fancier buttons than we've ever seen may come back with a vengeance,
and write the most glorious chapter yet in "A History of the Button."
In the meantime, whatever we
do we'll never take buttons for granted again. We'll finger them with
new reverence. If one of them pops off our shirt, or breaks under the
iron, we'll try to hold our tongue. And maybe we'll even start a little
button collection, with some of those bygone beauts.
Anybody out there got a Washington
Inaugural they'd be willing to part with?
A SINCERE "THANK YOU" to Diana
Epstein and Millicent Safro, proprietors of the "Tender Buttons" shop
at 143 East 62nd Street in New York City, for welcoming us into their
button-bountiful world, and letting us photograph one-of-a-kind treasures
from their collection. Anyone passing through the Big Apple shouldn't
miss visiting this Mecca of American Buttondown. (Tell 'em Roy sent you.)
Note: Though it's some years
since this essay appeared, Tender Buttons continues its tenure at the
same address.
|